11/7/2019 Commissioner Of Customs Orissa
ACTING COMMISSIONERJohn P. Sanders currently serves as the Chief Operating Officer of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
In that capacity, Mr. Sanders works with the Commissioner to identify and address the operational requirements of the agency, and to provide strategic direction and oversight of enterprise services and operational support components.DEPUTY COMMISSIONERRobert E.
Perez was named as the Deputy Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). In this role, he serves as the agency’s senior career official, with a primary focus of working closely with the Commissioner to ensure that CBP’s mission of protecting our Nation’s borders from terrorists and terrorist weapons is carried out effectively in partnership with other Federal, state, local, and foreign entities. Other top CBP priorities for which Mr.
Manila North HarborHistorical records show that the in the Philippines started many centuries back long before it was discovered by the eastern and western expeditionaries. The Philippines had already a flourishing trade with countries of, but since money at that time was not yet the medium of exchange, people then resorted to the barter system of commodities. The rulers of the were known as the datu or rajahs collected tributes from the people before they were allowed to engage in their trade. The practice of collecting tributes became part of their culture and was then observed and followed as the Customs Law of the Land.The Spanish Regime After had taken full control of almost all the trades of the country, it passed three important statutes:.
Spanish Customs Law which was similar to that of the Indies enforced in the country from 1582 to 1828. See also:On May 2017, a ₱6.4 billion worth of, locally known as shabu was seized in two warehouses in,.
The Bureau of Customs was criticized for its alleged role in the smuggling of the illegal drugs into the country.On May 28, 2017, the Bureau of Customs (BOC) seized ₱6.4 billion worth of in two warehouses in Barangay Ugong of in. The BOC said that they acted on an intelligence report relayed to them by the of China. The seizure was made in accordance to a Letter of Authority issued by BOC Commissioner.
The BOC officials reportedly accompanied by personnel of the and who inspected the warehouses found the contraband in five metal cylinders.Investigation:During the Senate and House hearings alleged details on how the shipment of illegal drugs was smuggled into the Philippines. On May 16, 2017, the ship Guang Ping Voyage No. 1719S, which carried the container with the seized methamphetamine arrived at the (MICP) in. The cargo of the ship was lodged on the next day by Customs broker, Teejay Marcellana, who claims that the shipment contained kitchenware.
The following day, the importer of the goods, EMT Trading which is owned by Eirene Tatad paid the customs and duties for the shipment. The firm says that they were not aware of the illegal drugs inside the shipment. The shipment was then passed through the green lane where shipments were not scanned through X-ray. According to protocol, shipments accepted by first time importers or from China were not allowed to be passed through the green lane. A truck registered under Golden Strike Logistics transported the container with methamphetamine out from the MICP on May 23.Chinese businessman Richard Tan, also known as Chen Ju Long, narrates during the congressional hearing that he called the Bureau of Customs at 11pm (PST) after he was informed about the illegal drugs shipment by Zhang Xiaohui of the Chinese.
Customs broker, Mark Taguba claims that Tan was behind the smuggling of the drugs who says that he was hired by the businessman to 'fix' the shipment through a middle man named Kenneth Dong.By the Senate:The made an investigation regarding the alleged role of the Bureau of Customs in the smuggling of the ₱6.4 billion worth of illegal drugs. The committee headed by has labeled of BOC personnel with alleged links to the case as either incompetent or coSee also.References.
Central Excise and Customs Office NameOffice AddressPhone No & Fax No.Email & Websites AddressCentral Excise,Office of the Chief Commissioner,Central Excise - Ahmedabad,Central Excise Bhawan, Opp. Gujarat Polytechnic,Ahmedabad- 380 009Phone:02, 4837 /6452, 6906 / 7296, 6182 / 7521ccahmdbd @ excise.nic.inwww.cenexahmedabad.nic.inCentral Excise, Ahmedabad-IIOffice of the Commissioner,Central Excise, Ahmedabad -IINr. All India Radio,Navrangpura,Ahmedabad - 380 009Control Room: (079)-2754-3917, EPBX:(079)-2754-0122,2754-1173,2754-3917cexahme2 @ excise.nic.inwww.cenexahmedabad.nic.inCentral Excise, Ahmedabad-IIIOffice of the Commissioner,Central Excise, Ahmedabad -IINr. All India Radio,Navrangpura,Ahmedabad - 380 009Control Room: (079)-2754-3917, EPBX:(079)-2754-0122,2754-1173,2754-3917ahmedab3 @ excise.nic.inwww.cenexahmedabad.nic.inCustoms & Central Excise Commissionerate,Customs & Central Excise Commissionerate, RajkotCentral Excise Bhavan,Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot.Gujarat ( India).HQ.
Control Room: Tel. No.: 2457735, PBX Ph.No.:24982.,Control Room: Tel.No.:24030. 213.cexrajkoad1 @ sancharnet.inwww.cenexahmedabad.nic.inCentral ExciseCommissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore - I Commissionerate, P.B. 5400, Central Revenue Building, Queens Road, Bangalore - 560 001.Phone:+ 4073Fax:+ 4170cexbang @ excise.nic.in, excise @ vsnl.com, commissioner @ mail.kar.nic.inExcise Bangalore-IICommissioner of Central Excise,Bangalore -II CommissionerateP.B.
5400, Central Revenue BuildingQueens Road, Bangalore - 560 001Phone:+ 5331Fax:+ 4426cebg2hq @ satyam.net.in, cebgii @ vsnl.comExcise Bangalore-IIICommissioner of Central ExciseBangalore -III CommissionerateP.B.
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court), dated 2 August 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 24 September 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of The Queen on the application of 1) Teleos plc 2) Unique Distribution Ltd 3) Synectiv Ltd 4) New Communications Ltd 5) Quest Trading Company Ltd6) Phones Interntional Ltd 7) AGM Associates Ltd 8) DVD Components Ltd 9) Fonecomp Ltd 10) Bulk GSM.
T heCustoms laws and procedure in India owe their parentage to the systemprevailing at the time of the Mauryas around Third Century B.C., as evidentfrom ‘Arthashartra’ of Kautilya. Kautilya has givenDalhousie Square250 years agoCourtesy NationalLibrary, Calcuttagraphic details ofCustoms procedure in respect of incoming merchandise.
The declaration toCustoms was to indicate the country of origin, value of the goods etc.Stringent penalty was provided for mis-declaration of description andfor under-valuation as also over-valuation. Punishment was alsoprovided for Customs officers onaccount of corruption and derelictionof duty. The general rate of taxation on imported commodities was 20per cent barring a few specified commodities.
Export goods were alsosubjected to Customs levy at the same rate. No commodities werepermitted to be sold in places where they were grown or manufactured.Foreign merchants were treated with respect and benevolence. Thesystematic and well organised Customs administration was handed downto posterity and the same tradition continued. Despitechanges of Rulers or the Government. During Mughal rulealso, we find that with minor variations, the ancient system ofCustoms procedure continued in respect of both Sea Customs as well asLand Customs. When the British East India Company entered thepolitical scene of India, particularly Bengal, they inherited thesystem ofTownand Port of CalcuttaCourtesy NationalLibrary, CalcuttainlandCustoms Duty collected through Customs Chowkeys. Lord Cornwalisabolished all the internal Custom Houses in Bengal and Bihar in 1788which was later revived in 1801.The Company also inherited the indigenous system of transit duties which was prevalent in India from the ancient time ofMauryas or even before, with slight variations.
FortWilliam from river HooghlyCourtesy NationalLibrary, CalcuttaIn ancient and medieval days,the transit Customs Duty was worked out in proportion to the distancetravelled and, therefore, the rate of Customs levy was never dis-proportionatelyhigh. The Customs inland duty introduced by the Company was ratherdisproportionately high as it was fixed at the average amount of the paymentsto which goods traveling long distances wereliable.Thus, the concept ofequalised freight was introduced by the Company which was advantageous todistant traders but prejudicial to the commercial intercourse betweenneighbouring places. The Company also introduced the system of passes fortransit movement which was earlier not in existence.
In the olden days, incoming and outgoing goods used to bear the seals of theauthorities, to lend legitimacy and to prevent substitution. Beginningof the Custom House in Calcutta can be traced to the end of SeventeenthCentury when old Fort William, situated at a distance of 160 Kms from Bay ofBengal was erected at Calcutta on the bank of river Hooghly (Ganges) in 1696.Calcutta at that time was under the control of Nawab of Bengal, Ibrahim Khan.The Nawab invitedFortWilliam from the opposite bank of river HooghlyCourtesy NationalLibrary, CalcuttaJob Charnok to Calcutta from Madras to lend naval andmilitary support against the upcoming rebel Shobha Singh, a formidablelandlord of Burdwan. The East India Company in return extracted severalconcessions from Ibrahim Khan, including the right of fortification.
Customsrevenue was collected in old Fort William. CustomHouse WharfCourtesy NationalLibrary, CalcuttaRobertClive, the Governor of Fort William after his victory in the battle of Plasseyagainst the Nawab of Bengal in 1757 felt the need for a stronger andstrategically better located site for the British fortress.
Thus, theconstruction of the new Fort was completed in 1781.SirRichard Bacher was appointed on 3 rd March, 1758, as the Sea andLand Customs Master to look into the business of the Customs Department. Hefelt the need for having an office in some convenient place which wasidentified as the site where Mr. Holwell’s house adjacent to the old ditchstood.
Holwell sold his property to the Company for Rs.9,500/-, for usingthe same as Custom House. Thus, the Custom House initially functioned fromHolwell’s house in Calcutta. The godowns and warehouses adjacent were alsobeing used for storage of goods brought through riverine route.Holwell’shouse being an old construction was found as not suitable for the functioningof the Custom House as owing to incessant rains in the monsoon, the oldconstruction gave way to seepage and leakage at many points. The building was,therefore, sold off for Rs.8,051/- only in 1760. The Custom House thereaftertemporarily functioned from a dwelling house till it was decided on the 8 thSeptember, 1766, that the apartments occupied by the Fort Major in the oldFort would stand appropriated for use of the Custom House Master. Evacuationof all militaries from the Fort area was completed in the beginning of 1767with a view to converting the Fort premises into a Custom House.
A number ofwarehouses and other buildings were erected inside the old Fort. From 1770,the old Fort. Steadilydipped into the Hooghly river. The Custom House at theextreme southern side of the old Fort disappeared in due course into theriver. The southern side of the old Fort with a long narrow furrow on theground was connected with a canal by which the boats could enter into theCustom House and the ships could be repaired without having the need for goingall the way to Bombay.CustomHouse first started functioning in Mr. Holwell's HouseCourtesy NationalLibrary, CalcuttaThe Marine Store Yard, the Dry Docks and the Bankshallwere all located at the site on which the present Bankshall Court is situatedtogether with other office buildings on the Bankshall Street.
The wordBankshall is the Dutch word meaning “a place of Customs toll collection”.The present General Post Office was erected in 1856 on the partial ruins ofold Fort William.Afterthe old Fort was completely evacuated, it was decided to construct a fullfledged Custom House at the site of the old Fort, facing the river Hooghly(Ganges). The foundation stone of the was laid by LordHastings on the 12 th February, 1819. It was a substantially widetwo storied building erected on the between CalcuttaCollectorate and Eastern India Railway House in Clive Street with its postaladdress at No.1, Charnok Place (situated on the western side of DalhousieSquare earlier known as Tanks Square). The iron gate of the Custom House facedClive Street and East India Railway Company was situated to its northern side.The Collector. FoundationStone laying ceremony(1940) of the present Custom HouseCourtesyThe Statesman, Calcuttaof Customs was occupying the first floor, together with hisAssistants and Clerks, while the ground floor was occupied by commodiouswarehouses, weighing rooms etc. In1899, the Custom House was renovated and re-established in the same placewhere it was earlier erected in 1819.
Commissioner Of Customs Orissa Form
For additional construction, land wasacquired at the price ofRs.1200/- per Cottah during 1890-91. A Laboratory wasalso constructed.
Thefoundation stone of the new Custom House (the present Custom House), situatedat 15/1, Strand Road, Calcutta, facing river Hooghly, was laid on the 10 thFebruary, 1940. The construction was completed sometime in 1942 when thesecond world war was in full swing.
Commissioner Of Customs Orissa Form
The occupation of the new Custom House waswithout much ceremony.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |